28 April 2008

Babu Ranganathan, ramblin' man, shows why intelligent design is not science

Particularly prolific in his defense of creationism/intelligent design, Babu Ranganathan must have taken some advice from the Allman Brothers. That would explain his tendency to write unparalleled, long-winded, pieces. But remember, he is "an experienced Christian writer", something that is obvious from his writing style. For instance, he seems to think that repeating a statement over and over and over again will somehow make it true:

The evidence from science shows that only microevolution (variations within a biological "kind" such as the varieties of dogs, cats, horses, cows, etc.) is possible but not macroevolution (variations across biological "kinds", especially from simpler kinds to more complex ones). The only evolution that occurs in Nature is microevolution (or horizontal evolution) but not macroevolution (vertical evolution).

The genetic ability for microevolution exists in Nature but not the genetic ability for macroevolution. The genes (chemical and genetic instructions or programs) for microevolution exist in every species but not the genes for macroevolution. Unless Nature has the intelligence and ability to perform genetic engineering (to construct entirely new genes and not just to produce variations and new combinations of already existing genes) then macroevolution will never be possible in Nature.

He also has the uncanny ability to take the bleedin' obvious and try to make it sound profound:
[If] a woman were to lose a finger it would not result in her baby being born with a missing finger. Similarly, even if an ape ever learned to walk upright, it could not pass this characteristic on to its descendants. Thus, modern biology has disproved the once-held theory that acquired characteristics from the environment can be transmitted into the genetic code of offspring.
Of course I shouldn't be too harsh. This is only bleedin' obvious if you have happened to read a biology textbook published since the McKinley administration. Finally, Mr. Ranganathan also has the experience necessary to write something not just wrong, but so mind-numbingly wrong that it makes you want to remove all the Brodman areas from your brain in numerical order with a grapefruit spoon just so that you will never again have to comprehend something so wrong.
It has been said that the eye of an octopus is more similar to the human eye than any other animal.

Mr. Ranganathan's errors have been pointed out before by others, but there is one thing that he has done for which scientists can be thankful. He has shown, in a surprising show of brevity, why creationism/intelligent design is not science in the traditional sense.

Yes, there are many genetic and biological similarities between species, but are these similarities because of common biological ancestry (macroevolution) or because of a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes in all of the various forms of life on earth from the simplest to the most complex. Neither position can be scientifically proved.

Dogs must breathe the same air as humans. The creationists, therefore, believe that the Creator designed similar lungs for both dogs and humans. The evolutionists believe that dogs and humans have similar lungs because they are related from millions of years ago.

So, how to tell which is right? Well, I can't tell you which is right, but I can tell you which is falsifiable. Imagine that dogs primarily used nitrogen rather than oxygen in the air they breathe. Or that chimpanzees had two hearts. Or if the ability to coagulate blood, an incredibly complex, multi-protein cascade were shown to be different in each and every mammal species then that would mean only one thing: evolutionary theory, the idea of common descent, is not sufficient to explain the evidence.
However, such things are not an impediment to creationism. After all, such evidence would just show that the creator chose to design each species with unique traits to set them apart from each other (certainly an easy feat for the omnipotent one). That is the wonderful thing about creationism. No matter what the evidence, it cannot be falsified. So, here is a question I want answered by creationists; and this is not a rhetorical question.

"What evidence, if found, would convince you that your theory (that life is the product of a creator) is wrong?"

This should be the first question asked of any theory purporting to be scientific. Until it is answered, your theory isn't falsifiable. And it sure as hell isn't science.

6 comments:

C. David Parsons said...

A PARAGON OF SCIENTIFIC ACHIEVEMENT!

The Quest for Right, a series of 7 textbooks created for the public schools, represents the ultimate marriage between an in-depth knowledge of biblical phenomena and natural and physical sciences. The several volumes have accomplished that which, heretofore, was deemed impossible: to level the playing field between those who desire a return to physical science in the classroom and those who embrace the theory of evolution. The Quest for Right turns the tide by providing an authoritative and enlightening scientific explanation of natural phenomena which will ultimately dethrone the unprofitable Darwinian view.

The text begins simply enough, tracing the history of Darwin from an impressionable youth influenced by atheists and agnostics on every hand to a full-fledged agnostic in his own right. The matter may be summed up by the inclusion of Darwin’s sentiment regarding the Creator. In a bitter denial of Christianity, Darwin complained that he "could hardly see how anyone ought to wish Christianity to be true; for if so, the plain language of the text seems to show that the men who do not believe, and this would include my Father, Brother and almost all my best friends, will be everlastingly punished. And this is a damnable doctrine." Darwin charged his original belief in God to the "constant inculcation" (instruction or indoctrination) in a belief in God" during his childhood, which was as difficult to cast down as "for a monkey to throw off its instinctive fear and hatred of a snake…. Darwin purposed in his heart that he would no longer retain God in his knowledge. And the scientific illiterate upstart sought to entrap the innocents in the classroom in his web of deceit.

Once past the history of the Darwinist movement, the architecture of the quantum atom is explored in great detail. This is breathtakingly new!

The atom has been compared to a miniature sun-earth system with one or more electrons darting about everywhere at once weaving an electronic shell around the nucleus. In order for this to occur, “Bohr calculated that the electron must move at a speed of no less than seven million billion rotations per second.” Ummmm, "numerous electrons darting about, dodging one another at breakneck speeds would necessarily require the supernatural. The Quest for Right will prove to your complete satisfaction that the electron is directly adhered to the perimeter of the nucleus. “How could it have been otherwise?” The exciting text is remarkably easy to follow even for a lay person. Read a review:

"I am amazed at the breadth of the investigation - scientific history, biblical studies, geology, biology, geography, astronomy, chemistry, paleontology, and so forth - and find the style of writing to be quite lucid and aimed clearly at a general, lay audience." ― Mark Roberts, former Editor of Biblical Reference Books, Thomas Nelson Publishers.

The book is a virtual smorgasbord of good things to taste: a few of the entertaining subjects include: the earth was created from a watery nebula, the mechanism of gravity which was used to form the earth, the failed photoelectric effect, theory of antimatter, quantum creation (big bang theory), disappearing color, magical application of mathematics to explain certain rudimentary principles, Rayleigh scattering (sunsets), electricity, lightning, electrolyte, the browning of fruit, the mystery of fire, and the role of oxygen in the ignition of hydrocarbons. Then, there’s the desserts which are far too numerous to mention in this limited space; for example, the origin and dimise of the great dinosaurs. Moreover, you will marvel at the comprehensive law of fixed choice.

This is not your parent’s science book filled with distortions of the truth, called “quantum mysticism.” The comprehensive investigation--like none other you will read--quickly escapes into realism by underscoring the numerous experiments and errors responsible for the debasement of scientific theories based on whim. Teachers and students will rejoice in the simplicity of earthly phenomena when entertained by the new discipline.

The Quest for Right is not only an academic resource designed for the public schools, but also contains a wealth of information on pertinent subjects that seminarians, and Christians in general, need to know to be effective: geology, biology, geography, astronomy, chemistry, paleontology, and in-depth Biblical studies. The nuggets from the pages of Biblical history alone will give seminarians literally hundreds of fresh ideas for sermons and teachings. The ministry resources contained in The Quest for Right serve as invaluable aids that will enrich graduates beyond their highest expectations.

Visit the official website for additional information: http://questforright.com

SoD said...

A Thing that has not yet been disproved … can hold it’s reasonable assumption that it exist; And as long as a Thing remain unproven, it can maintain it’s greatest possibility of being so. Indeed in this world, Intelligent Design has faltered, but because the beautiful and shinning crystal glass was shattered when it fell to the floor, doesn’t mean it’s Superior Design didn’t exist before it’s fragments were disarranged.

Knowing that the ‘We’ of an Intelligent Mind Soul, are Beings of a ‘’Complex Designed Circuitry of Intelligent Energy’; and knowing that a Soul is that ghost-like Energy which engulfs the Mind at all times; and knowing that the Spirit is but the accelerated state of any energy: I am comfortable being rooted in the knowledge that ‘We’ were brought into existence by the Master Creator.

‘One’ who’s Massive Intelligence of a Complex Circuitry of ‘Charged Plasma Energy’ is Adorned in the immeasurable Gown of Inert and Shiny Blackness of Dark Matter … a Being of the greatest intelligence known and unknown …. One who did create and do hold firm the very Designed Foundation of all Worlds created … that same One who sit in Highest position of all Her Creations of 9 Universal Planes, and who in doing so established 4 Inner Dimensional Levels there in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th, Universal Planes and 3 Inner Dimensional Levels there in the and 8th Universal Plane; as Earth now sets in open view here in the 7th Universal Plane of endless darkness. All Planes and their Inner Dimensional levels are held in placed by the stabilizing accomplishments of Quantum Frequencies.

Of such A Creator is said; if Her Shiny Gown of Dark Matter was to transform into a Voltage Being of Lightening, and were to step down from Her hidden Place there in the First Dimensional Level of the First Universal Plane; and were to take journey through our known universe of expanded darkness. Her appearance would stand as a Five Figurative Form of Blue Lightening. Taller than any known Nebula. And that spiraling galaxies would be as tiny lily pads coupling each Her every gigantic Footsteps; and that each lily pad of a galaxy, would buckle to fall in scattered debris at Her passing.

So Knowing what I am sure of, there is no need to debate rather or not that ‘We’ of Intelligent Mind Souls were Designed or a mishap of evolutionized procedures of a natural development. I stand In full knowledge of my Creator. I am just an Old Sold passing through, with something important to say.

Never miss an answer for Today's Mystical Concerns All Around Us;
Planet X, UFOs, reptilian colonies, celestial colonies, Lucifer, rapture,
Beelzebub, Satan, inseminated babies, clones, earth's core ignites,
VISIT THE ENLIGHTENING SITE OF SOD http://sod2008.multiply.com
register as a friend … ask questions … leave comments …or email me at
evelynseedofdavid@gmail.com

John Pieret said...

Mr. Ranganathan also has the experience necessary to write something not just wrong, but so mind-numbingly wrong that it makes you want to remove all the Brodman areas from your brain in numerical order with a grapefruit spoon just so that you will never again have to comprehend something so wrong.

A very funny line ... or it would have been had I thought to remove all grapefruit spoons from my house.

I gave up chasing Babuisms because I needed what was left of my brain to chew my pablum here at the home. Now I only go as far as the first gob-smackingly dumb thing he writes, which means I rarely get out of the first paragraph.

Nice takedown! But don't become a "This is your Brain ... this is your brain on Babu" statistic.

Tantalus Prime said...

Stupid Blogger, not posting my comments.

Those first two are so funny I just had to leave them in. I soiled my armour I was laughing so hard.

Not to worry Pieret. Babu shows up in my reader once every two weeks or so, but I find his tantrums so incoprehensible that I can hardly get through the first paragraph or two. But this one, I just had to say something about it.

Angry Lab Rat said...

Wow. Those first two comments are incredibly long-winded, rambling, zealous, and misleading. It proves Tantalus' points exactly.

Furthermore, they still didn't try to answer the question posed at the end of the post.

Good one, Tantalus.

sexy said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.